When Mitt Romney declared tonight in the debate he would label China a "Currency Manipulator" I really didn't know what he meant. I didn't know if it was actually a legal stance of some kind. Or if it just meant that Romney picks up the phone and calls china and yells "currency manipulator" and hangs up like a crank call.
So in the interest of self education, I did a little googling. I found this article that tells what it is and what it means so I thought I would share for others who may not have a clue.
Odds are that Mitt Romney’s promise to brand China a “currency manipulator” will figure heavily in tonight’s foreign policy debate. There’s good reason for that. Branding China a “currency manipulator” is popular! That’s why almost every presidential candidate promises to do it. But it also doesn’t make much sense, which is why presidents typically don’t do it.
More importantly, though, it is, at this point, an out-of-date argument. The “currency manipulator” question made a lot of sense in 2000 or 2004 or 2008. It doesn’t make much sense in 2012. But the political conversation on this issue, as so often happens, hasn’t quite caught up to the facts. It’s missing the substantial improvements China has made in recent years, and the role that other actors now play in global currency manipulation. Here’s what you need to know: